Jump to content

kroniclesking

Lifetime Members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey BBT, Wondering if anyone might have some insight into my question about the panic button in DAS. Will pressing the panic button close all positions across all my accounts, or just the one that is activated in DAS? For example, if I want to close my current day trade positions in X account, will it also close my swing positions in Y account?
  2. It happens to me too. I don't know why it does it. A few times I changed my password to get it to log in. Try going through the account manager link below: https://cme.propreports.com/login.php
  3. How often does CMEG update the trades that you take in your account manager? I realized a few bucks, but I can't see it reflected in my equity in either DAS or account manager. In fact, I don't see any of the trades on the account manager website. Does it take a day for it to get updated in the CMEG system?
  4. Hello from Sonoma. I'm RSVPing for the Bay Area meet up. Looking forward to meeting everyone.
  5. @Carlos M. I appreciate the insight into this. I like your point as it comes back to managing risk among all your trades and aiming for AT LEAST 1:2 risk/reward in order to offset the commission and fees. I think if you can manage that kind of risk and be profitable with commission costs that CMEG offers, then you would do awesome with a broker that offers better commission for a large account.
  6. I really don't see the benefits of the new commission structure with CMEG (assuming we are purchasing more than 740 shares). It seems it was beneficial for us to trade at the flat rate of 2.95 per trade flat, as the commission per share with the new structure begins costing more once you reach more than 740 shares. Am I missing something?
  7. @JasonHeidecker but I believe I see your point. Are you saying that regardless of many fills it takes to complete a trade, the costs of commission + additional fees comes out the same because the commission structure is based on # of shares In other words, 1 fill to buy 500 shares = 4 fills to buy 500 share?
  8. @JasonHeidecker I think his point is that some members seem to say that they get charged only twice for a roundtrip trade, where @Nomen Ama believes he is being overcharged because of the amount of fills it may take to complete each side of a trade.
  9. I see I see. Thanks for pointing that out!
  10. @Skye Wow 1.20 round trip? That is surprisingly good. How did you get your commission so low? As a Bearbull member, I thought each ticket was 2.99 in commission, which is supposed to be the special deal that we get.
  11. @Skye What is your average commission + fees round trip (buy or sell, vice versa) that you observe? How many shares do you typically purchase per ticket?
  12. This broker seems comparable option to CMEG for traders with an account of less than 25k. In terms of commission, Alliance offers .0035 per share commission, which seems comparable to CMEG's 2.99 per ticket price if you are purchasing ~800 shares; however, CMEG seems to have advantage if you are purchasing more than 1k shares in a single trade. I'm wondering what are some general thoughts, opinions, and experience anyone has with this particular broker Happy trading
  13. As a new trader, it is a challenge to walk away once the goal is met, and I debated with myself what is the most effective way to learn the market, price behavior, and developing efficient and effective skills. I asked myself, should I be more liberal with my trades, even if this means over-trading? By doing this, I can learn price behavior, recognizing and taking entries through "reps" (the more I trade the more experienced I will be)? Athletes take this approach to fine tune their game. On the other hand, I asked myself, should I be more conservative with my trades, ending my day with a profit goal/loss, even if this means decreasing the exposure I have to the market? In the end I opted for the latter. I believe being more conservative mimics the behavior of trading in a live account, and reduces the likelihood that I will develop bad habits and inconsistencies. I played video games competitively throughout my life, playing in tournaments and leagues for money. I find that there are many similarities that day trading has with competitive gaming and sports. One thing I try to really avoid during competitions and day-trading is stat checking because the more I check my stats, the worse off I am. Mentally, I feel that when I lend my attention to my stats, my performance decreases because I take away attention from the game at hand. Even behaviors such as celebrating and complimenting myself early can impact my performance (conditioning). In the end, I minimize my account window and focus purely on trading as much as I can. As a researcher in psychology, I understand that there are many psychological theories that may explain this. Research has demonstrates the effects of mental load and fatigue, inattentional blindness on performance (Boksem et al., 2005; Hyman et al., 2010). As traders, we are required to process a significant amount information at once that will ultimately inform our decision. We constantly monitor price action, Level 2, historical evidence, indicators, emotions, etc. Processing this much information requires a significant mental load, which our brains can withstand so much of. After analyzing pre-market behavior and technicals, and taking our profits after analyzing opening action, we are mentally fatigued, despite our motivation to continue trading. Once fatigued by our initial trades, we stop perceiving things as clearly. Mix mental fatigue with high emotions (prolonged sympathetic activation), we might be easy to lose sight of details and misinterpret information, resulting in potential drops in performance. While I believe that trades are independent of each other, I don't think our perception and biases are independent. I believe there are carryover effects that leak from one trade to another. We bring our biases from one successful trade, and might apply it to another trade, for better or worse. For example, in one trade, we might have take a trade on a VWAP hold that proves successful. In the next trade, we might see similar VWAP hold pattern, take the trade, and lose. Maybe we didn't perceive the lack of volume in the second trade? Whatever it may be, we may have been highly influenced by the first trade, which may have distorted our perception in the trades, ignoring details that might indicate otherwise. In the end, while I believe that there is a correlation between # of trades and performance, I don't think there is a single factor that contributes to decreases in performance, but, rather, all factors collectively contribute to losses from overtrading. There are other things such as time-of-day, lack of volume, proportions of retail traders vs. institutional later in the day, etc, that may also have an effect. Maybe an internal study could be conducted on this. I'd be happy to volunteer
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.