Jump to content

We have moved to Discord. Please click here to join us in the Trading Terminal Discord server.



These forums are read-only.

RussWilliamL

DAS Calculating Camarilla Pivot Points WRONG??

Recommended Posts

RussWilliamL

I really hesitate to bring this up since I've got a working strategy using the Camarilla Pivot Points in DAS.  However, I believe DAS is calculating the Pivot Points incorrectly.

 Here's an example of what I found.

Solving for R4 using the accepted formula: R4 = C + ((H-L)*1.5000)

MSFT on 4/10/2023  Close=289.39 High=289.60 Low=284.71

R4= 296.725 = (289.39 +((289.60-284.71)*1.5000)

However, DAS shows R4 on 4/11/2023 as 292.024 (this is DAS calculating WITHOUT using pre/post market data by the way)

When I "reverse-engineer" the DAS calculation for R4 using algebra, I find that DAS calculated like this: R4 = C + ((H-L)*0.5386)

I checked the eleven stocks I watch, and the DAS R4 multiplication factor ranges from 0.54 to 0.57.

Like I said, I'm a bit worried that the DAS programmers might fix this error.  If they DO fix it, a TON of BBT folks will have their strategies completely blown out of the water.

 

All the best,

Russell Landwehr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Martin D

I disagree with your accepted formula, this is different from Thor's book, pivot boss, IB etc etc. I wondered where this had come from and I see the first one that comes up when I googled has it listed like yours but every other source I looked at has 1.1/2 (instead of your 1.5).

Using your other figures it pretty much lines up with DAS calculation so don't think there is an issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RussWilliamL
9 hours ago, Martin D said:

I disagree with your accepted formula, this is different from Thor's book, pivot boss, IB etc etc. I wondered where this had come from and I see the first one that comes up when I googled has it listed like yours but every other source I looked at has 1.1/2 (instead of your 1.5).

Using your other figures it pretty much lines up with DAS calculation so don't think there is an issue

1.1/2 is the same as 1.5

My point is that DAS isn't using 1.5 (or 1.1/2), it is using 0.54 (or 0.1/2)

Edited by RussWilliamL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Martin D

 

4 minutes ago, RussWilliamL said:

1.1/2 is the same as 1.5

1.1/2 isn't the same as 1.5. 1.1 divided by 2 is 0.55

DAS is a few cents away from what I get using your figures but DAS also has the odd dodgy prints so that's not surprising, a few cent matters little compared to some of the other issues DAS has with certain indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RussWilliamL
5 hours ago, Martin D said:

 

1.1/2 isn't the same as 1.5. 1.1 divided by 2 is 0.55

DAS is a few cents away from what I get using your figures but DAS also has the odd dodgy prints so that's not surprising, a few cent matters little compared to some of the other issues DAS has with certain indicators.

Aha!  I was reading "1.1/2" as "one point one-half"... and apparently so are some other "experts" who make webpages about stock indicators.

NOW it makes sense... 

THANKS!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[[Template core/front/global/mobileNavigation is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.