Aki

Hi Justin, But just statistically, I don't find the advantage of trading more than one trade; Sure, both could win on both days, so I have four winners at half the budget each; but if I have two at the whole budget win on both days, it's again the same outcome ...

Hi, I wonder what sense it makes to trade two trades at the same time, given that it makes things more complicated; If I enter two trades on two days, each with 10.000$ and one of them loses on each day, it has the same effect like if I enter only one trade with 20.000$ and on one day I win, on the second day I lose ... thanks for an idea, Aki

ok, thanks for your info about stops

I'm familiar with this proceeding, but I ponder about wether it also makes sense to limit the amount for one trade for the other reason of stop-losses not being respected because prise rushing through and you get filled at half your account; I don't agree, because he always displays his impressive gains, so I have to put them into a frame of reference anyway. And if you don't know what percentage he makes, these numbers are wild, without any reference. best

Hi Justin, Ah, ok, thanks for clarification; I meant that he is trading two trades at the same time ... and I wonder if he does it because he wants to prevent himself from just the case that I mentioned first - a radical price-drop of one security, which may result in a heavy loss if he puts all his money into only one trade; Is there a recommended rule as to a maximum percentage of the account to put into one trade? in the books I only find rules for the stop-losses when it comes to risk-management; as if the stop-losses would always work and the price never would rush through; And one more thing, if I may - do you know how much money he normally invests to achieve these impressive gains? hope this is no overstressing, thanks!

um thats not what I meant; I meant I don't understand why a hard versus a manual stop should make difference in choosing between limit or market, because Bryan wrote this: "When you have a hard stop order, it's usually advisable to use a MARKET order" and this: "I don't use hard stops, but if I did, they'd be MARKET" and, the fill in the example above was far more terrible, I think he lost one third or so ... by the way, do you think Andrew opens two trades at the same time instead of putting the whole amount into one because of things like this?

Thanks for your reply. He posted this one two years ago, that's how I came to it: ROUTE=SMRTL;Share=BP*0.25;TIF=DAY+;Price=ASK+0.10;BUY=Send;ROUTE=STOP;StopType=Market;StopPrice=AvgCost-0.30;Share=Pos;TIF=DAY+;SELL=Send; Why would it makes a difference in respect to Limit vs Market wether you put a hard stop or a manual one, if the price shoots through? I was just thinking that it's better *not* to get filled at a very bad price, but just keep the shares until they move up again - which in the above mentioned example was the case just after another split-second; Usually if it shoots really fast through, it shouldn't be for a bad news, but rather for a single sell-off, no?

Hi all, A few days ago one of the moderators shared a trade of his in which the price did an extreme low within a fraction of a second, which resulted in his exit being executed so far away from his stop-loss that he lost many many times more than his stop-loss was designed to do. That's why I wonder why Andrew is using MARKET orders for his stop-losses; any input I'm grateful. Aki